|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Fwd: re: trip computers (a thread from last week)
Message authorized by: : albrecht@ix.netcom.com%ussmtp at ccx400uk John An interesting addition to the thread, well for me anyway. When I first purchased my car '89 V12 the trip computer was pretty much spot on. About a month after, I developed a lumpy idle that I could not fix. At the same time as the idle problem started the trip computer began reading incorrectly, it is out by about 2-3mpg. The distance travelled reading is spot on, it is jut the fuel consumed that is incorrect. My friendly mechanic has had a play and has decided it is was a faulty ecu (he had problems adjusting the mixture as well). Since my car has the Marelli ignition it took 5 months before he had another car in with the correct ecu. We put the donor ecu into my car and the problems appeared to go away. Until I get around to replacing the theoretically faulty ecu I would like to get my trip computer reading more accurately so if you do manage to assemble a calibration device I would be interested. Keeping a weather eye on the fuel consumption is the best method of stopping me using the full power of the XJ-S all the time. I have already had one speeding ban and I don't want another. Don't try racing police cars, they always win one way or another :-(. Richard Richard.mansell@ps.net ______________________________ Forward Header __________________________________ Subject: Fwd: re: trip computers (a thread from last week) Author: owner-jag-lovers@sn.no%ussmtp at ccx400uk Date: 13/02/97 13:51 If there is enough interest, I'll design a circuit to allow user calibration of this. Interested people, please e-mail me directly with your current "percent of inaccuracy" on your fuel consumption reading. Please use the format X:Y, where X represents what your trip computer reports, and Y represents what the gas-pump typically shows. For example, if your trip computer reports 20gallons, and the gas-pump shows 22 gallons, you would report this as 20: 22. I need the info to get an idea of the range of inaccuracy people are seeing. Thanks, John A. 84 XJ6
|
|
Improve your Jag-lovers experience with the Mozilla FireFox Browser!
View the latest posts from our Forums via an RSS Feed! ©Jag-loversTM Ltd / JagWEBTM 1993 - 2024 All rights reserved. Jag-lovers is supported by JagWEBTM For Terms of Use and General Rules see our Disclaimer Use of the Jag-lovers logo or trademark name on sites other than Jag-lovers itself in a manner implying endorsement of commercial activities whatsoever is prohibited. Sections of this Web Site may publish members and visitors comments, opinion and photographs/images - Jag-lovers Ltd does not assume or have any responsibility or any liability for members comments or opinions, nor does it claim ownership or copyright of any material that belongs to the original poster including images. The word 'Jaguar' and the leaping cat device, whether used separately or in combination, are registered trademarks and are the property of Jaguar Cars, England. Some images may also be © Jaguar Cars. Mirroring or downloading of this site or the publication of material or any extracts therefrom in original or altered form from these pages onto other sites (including reproduction by any other Jaguar enthusiast sites) without express permission violates Jag-lovers Ltd copyright and is prohibited |