|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [xj-s] Re: V-12 swap for XJ6. Is this crazy?
>>What's wrong with the XJ40. There was a V12 version Mike Morrin wrote >No, there was (according to my recollection of fact) no XJ12 between the >Series 3 and the X300, as the XJ40 engine bay was too narrow. This was >reportedly to stop British Leyland from fitting the Rover V8 into the XJ40 >in place of the AJ6. Yes, there are XJ40 bodied XJ12s. In fact a contributor to this list was jsut talking about having bought a '94 XJ12 not long ago. Follow-Ups:
|
|
Improve your Jag-lovers experience with the Mozilla FireFox Browser!
View the latest posts from our Forums via an RSS Feed! ©Jag-loversTM Ltd / JagWEBTM 1993 - 2024 All rights reserved. Jag-lovers is supported by JagWEBTM For Terms of Use and General Rules see our Disclaimer Use of the Jag-lovers logo or trademark name on sites other than Jag-lovers itself in a manner implying endorsement of commercial activities whatsoever is prohibited. Sections of this Web Site may publish members and visitors comments, opinion and photographs/images - Jag-lovers Ltd does not assume or have any responsibility or any liability for members comments or opinions, nor does it claim ownership or copyright of any material that belongs to the original poster including images. The word 'Jaguar' and the leaping cat device, whether used separately or in combination, are registered trademarks and are the property of Jaguar Cars, England. Some images may also be © Jaguar Cars. Mirroring or downloading of this site or the publication of material or any extracts therefrom in original or altered form from these pages onto other sites (including reproduction by any other Jaguar enthusiast sites) without express permission violates Jag-lovers Ltd copyright and is prohibited |