Donate NOW and support Jag-lovers!

IMPORTANT! We have moved! The new site is at www.jag-lovers.com and the new Forums can be found at forums.jag-lovers.com

Please update your links. This old site will be left up for reference, until we can move all the old content over to the new site.

Volunteers wanted! Please help us move information from these pages to the new site, and also join us in providing new, exciting content.



Serving Enthusiasts since 1993
The Jag-lovers Web

Currently with 3,166 members





Accidental automatics
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Accidental automatics


  • To: jag-lovers@sn.no
  • Subject: Accidental automatics
  • From: Richard.Mansell@psemail.ps.net
  • Date: Sun, 23 Feb 1997 17:48:00 +0000
  • Autoforwarded: FALSE
  • Importance: Normal
  • Original-Encoded-Information-Types: ISO6937-Text
  • Sender: owner-jag-lovers@sn.no
  • Sensitivity: Personal
  • Ua-Content-Id: Accidental autom
  • X400-Mts-Identifier: [/P=PSE/A=MCI/C=GB/;c\pscgcc02\970223191321b]

     
     The thread recently about accidentally putting the auto box in reverse 
     at inopportune moments reminded me of an article I cut out ages ago 
     about fatal accidents involving XJ-S's.
     
     Since my family will be expanding to three shortly, the two legged 
     variety, not the 4 tyred type :-( , my wife had ordered me to tidy up 
     my magazines this weekend. Whilst leafing through them the article 
     surfaced again. 
     
     It is from January 1981, motor magazine (UK)
     
     Jaguar's selector blamed for another accident
     
     It was in August 1979 that we reported a fatal accident involving a 
     Jaguar XJ-S. The car had veered out of control across the road and hit 
     a car coming the other way, in which three people lost their lives. 
     (Picture of smashed car was also included)
     
     From the evidence presented at the inquest it seemed abundantly clear 
     that what has happened was that the Jaguar driver had used the 
     automatic selection lever to go down to second gear and then in moving 
     it forward to Drive position had gone too far and put the car into 
     reverse.
     
     We can well sympathise with such a mistake, which is all too easy to 
     make with the vague, wrongly gated selector control which Jaguar 
     persist in fitting. We have criticised it over and over again  in our 
     Autotests. What is not widely appreciated is that if an automatic 
     transmission selector is moved to reverse position, reverse on most 
     cars will usually engage, whatever the speed, instantly locking the 
     rear wheels and sending the car out of control.
     
     There has now been another fatal accident. At an inquest in Oswestry, 
     just before Christmas, the court heard how a woman passenger was 
     killed when a Jaguar XJ-S went out of control, crossing the road and 
     hit the car in which she was travelling. Accident investigator PC 
     Keith Little said he believed the accident was caused by the Jaguar's 
     automatic gear selector moving from forward position to Reverse or 
     Park and added that the motoring press had been critical of the 
     automatic shift control in the Jaguar.
     
     For the manufacturer, the moral of these tragedies is clear:
     
     There should be no obstruction to free movement between Drive and 
     second gear positions, otherwise the detents safeguarding other 
     positions become of no effect. If is an unwanted block between D and 2 
     has to be overcome, there is nothing to prevent inadvertent movement 
     beyond these positions. In the Jaguar case the problem is particularly 
     bad, since a block between D and 2 has to be cleared by moving the 
     lever sideways both when changing down and changing up.
     
     Jaguar will continue to fit the deplorable T-handle control whose 
     woolly action is so unworthy of the cars. We can not understand why 
     they refuse to adopt the far superior transmission selector system 
     used in the Rover. The 1979 accident suggested modifications were 
     required; the recent all-to-similar case confirms it.
     
     
     Me again, hope you found the above article interesting. If not, sorry 
     to waste the bandwidth.
     
     Richard
     richard.mansell@ps.net '89 XJ-S

Follow-Ups:

 

Please help support the move to the new site, and DONATE what you can.
A big Thank You to those who have donated already!

 


       
       
       
       

Go to our Homepage
Improve your Jag-lovers experience with the Mozilla FireFox Browser!

  View the latest posts from our Forums via an RSS Feed!

©Jag-loversTM Ltd / JagWEBTM 1993 - 2024
All rights reserved. Jag-lovers is supported by JagWEBTM
For Terms of Use and General Rules see our Disclaimer
Use of the Jag-lovers logo or trademark name on sites other than Jag-lovers itself in a manner implying endorsement of commercial activities whatsoever is prohibited. Sections of this Web Site may publish members and visitors comments, opinion and photographs/images - Jag-lovers Ltd does not assume or have any responsibility or any liability for members comments or opinions, nor does it claim ownership or copyright of any material that belongs to the original poster including images. The word 'Jaguar' and the leaping cat device, whether used separately or in combination, are registered trademarks and are the property of Jaguar Cars, England. Some images may also be © Jaguar Cars. Mirroring or downloading of this site or the publication of material or any extracts therefrom in original or altered form from these pages onto other sites (including reproduction by any other Jaguar enthusiast sites) without express permission violates Jag-lovers Ltd copyright and is prohibited
Go to our Homepage
Your Browser is: Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com), IP Address logged as 3.17.186.247 on 21st May 2024 17:07:34