|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Yet another XK8 sighting report
Saw my first XK8 today (yeah, I don't get out much, and I live in Bubba central, nearest Jag dealer is three hours away). It was a red convertible, parked at a restaurant. After hearing all the other people's comments on how this car looks better in real life than in pictures, I was ready for that -- I have had that experience before. However, my impression of this car was WORSE than the pictures. I won't be saving my pennies for one of these cars, and I can't imagine that teenagers will be planning to go to med school just to be able to afford one the way they did for the E-type. I had been anticipating a chance to find out if those buck teeth in the cowl were removable. It appears that removing them would be unwise, since they are there to decorate a large tubular structural member that goes across the opening. This structural member needs painting flat black BAD -- the chrome rib doesn't totally cover it, and the clearly visible unfinished metal tubing looks like something Ford would do. The dashboard is atrocious. Lots of beautiful wood, but the distinct impression that the wood isn't the dash -- it's just a pretty covering over the real dash underneath. Like, "it's really plastic, but 'quality' cars are supposed to have wood, so we slapped some wood on TOP of the plastic." To add insult to injury, they stenciled the "XK8" insignia on the far right corner, so the passenger would know what car he's riding in. Not a gold-plated trim piece or even gold lettering, but some tacky-looking tan paint. Ford strikes again. MUCH better if they had left it off -- wonder if it can be rubbed off? 17" wheels. I suppose that's the trend these days, and considering the cost of large 15" tires, I would have at least gone to 16". But 17"? I dunno. Would expect the ride to suffer, but I can't vouch for that, didn't ride in it. I don't think the wheels are very pretty either, but they are a lot better than some others these days. One more note: As an XJ-S owner, I can now feel proud of my back seat! Although I normally would never ask anyone over 5 feet tall to sit in it, it is the back seat of a Rolls Royce compared to the back seat in the XK8 convertible! I really don't understand why the car companies do this kinda shit -- what good does it do to install a totally unusable back seat? Why don't they just install a good storage compartment instead? Or design a single seat facing sideways? That feature also smacks of Ford. I'm glad it's selling well for them. I hope they are investing the profits wisely; their long-term outlook doesn't look too good to me. -- Kirbert | If anything is to be accomplished, | some rules must be broken. | - Palm's Postulate Follow-Ups:
|
|
Improve your Jag-lovers experience with the Mozilla FireFox Browser!
View the latest posts from our Forums via an RSS Feed! ©Jag-loversTM Ltd / JagWEBTM 1993 - 2024 All rights reserved. Jag-lovers is supported by JagWEBTM For Terms of Use and General Rules see our Disclaimer Use of the Jag-lovers logo or trademark name on sites other than Jag-lovers itself in a manner implying endorsement of commercial activities whatsoever is prohibited. Sections of this Web Site may publish members and visitors comments, opinion and photographs/images - Jag-lovers Ltd does not assume or have any responsibility or any liability for members comments or opinions, nor does it claim ownership or copyright of any material that belongs to the original poster including images. The word 'Jaguar' and the leaping cat device, whether used separately or in combination, are registered trademarks and are the property of Jaguar Cars, England. Some images may also be © Jaguar Cars. Mirroring or downloading of this site or the publication of material or any extracts therefrom in original or altered form from these pages onto other sites (including reproduction by any other Jaguar enthusiast sites) without express permission violates Jag-lovers Ltd copyright and is prohibited |