|
Upholstery - Seat BacksHi to all, I am still wrestling with the apholstery on my 140 OTS, and have a question on what is the correct material for back of back rests on car seats. What I am removing from back of seats appears to be vinyl while what Bartlett has supplied with replacement kit appears to be more like felt. It has a fluffy tecture. Can anyone comment, is the felt type material correct, or did Jag use both materials? Thanks, Neville Laing Back of my 150 OTS seats originally had the mouse fur stuff (Moquette? ) and the new kit I have from BAS, not the minimum kit but the "I am the pickiest, most anal, perfectionistic SOB in the world Kit" has the same stuff on the seat backs so I guess thats it then. DAVID M DRENZEK The last 140 in my posession was a DHC. It had the "mouse fur" , "Velour" , "Moquette" type fabric to which I think you refer. I wouldn't be surprised if the OTS's came with vinyl due to the need to withstand elements and, as far as I can remember on the only 140 OTS that passed through my hands briefly as a parts car around '82, no rear jump seats from which some impressionable minor or under aged girl, would have the opportunity to ogle the seat backs. No, sorry, I don't even remember if my OTS 140 had seats in it, much less what the material of the backs might have been. :-) But, to fuel the controversial fire, my current 120 OTS # 670640 has some kind of loop-pile, almost like carpeting on the seat backs. But, I've written here before about the oddities of these seats/this vehicle! Happy hunting! Dave GomesNeville, my drophead has a fuzzy material on the backs. This may have been used for the more "closed" models. Perhaps Jag thought a less upholstered material was appropriate for the open two-seater? James Warren The seat backs for my two 150 OTS were covered in moquette. The original seat materials have been replaced but are stored for whatever reason I save this stuff for. Bob Oates Just a comment on the moquette, and a personnel preference. Have recently reupholstered my 150 DHC. When it came to the moquette, I made sure that it was used in the correct places, with the exception of the floor area over the 'pumpkin bump'' between the rear seats, where I used vinyl cloth instead. The motivation was to provide a surface which would not wear as quickly as the moquette when exposed to constant placement of the ice chest during current and projected long drives and frequent use...What a fun car to drive. WIlliam C. Burke I have a related question, where I would appreciate some advice. Does anyone know what material ( if any ) was used to cover the backside of the two small removable back rests for the extra seats in a 150 DHC? The ones I have display just the plywood, with a press stud to fasten it to the hardura of the back of the compartment ( difficult to find all the correct words in English). Front face is vinyl. Should that be leather, since the two fron staes are leather ( with moquette on the back as many of you have pointed out already). Regards Claes G Boregar I'm in the process of restoring an early 140 rd. the original seats had a furry material on the backs. Kenneth P. Beck Hi, The XK-140 OTS has Moquette seat backs, just like the other models, Mike Carpenter Hi To All Thanks to those who have responded to my question on material on back of seat back rest. Since posing that question I have been paging through Porter's Original Jaguar XK. Could anyone comment on the correctness of upholstery in the pictures on pages 54,55,56 and 57 and in particular if there should be any differences for a Roadster. Obviously the door panels are different and I do not have the small seats for children without legs. (Porter's joke, not mine.) The picture on page 57 shows the side of the back rest (middle of car), is it correct to have the 10 chrome screws on this side? Also is the shape of the piece held in place by the screws correct? It differs from what I am dismantling on my car. Thanks in advance Neville Laing I recently redid the back seats of my 150FHC which appeared to be original. I believe the back of the seat should be as you described; plywood with a snap to mount the seat. The seat fronts were leather, with a (I don't know the term) velvet-like material around the sides of the seats. Hope this helps. Jag150S Hi again, Has anyone , after trimming off chords at edges, put new seat covers over old. Did doing this create any problems? The only problem I can forsee is that that the seat backs will be a little wider and may rub against each other in the center of the car. I am thinking of doing this on the back rests because they appear to have the correct shape and are firm. The seats are not as firm so I may have to replace foam, so may as well leave old covers off. Thanks again Neville Laing Neville: Neat idea, but I expect you won't get a first class result. Your seat back covers will definitely not fit properly because you will be unable to staple the tuck strip attached to the inside of the inner piping to the wood frame, and the feel of the seat will be affected as well. You can always try it and undo the work before final trimming if you don't like what you end up with. I recovered my seats recently (with the exception of the moquette, which I am still scratching my head over) and it was without question one of the more difficult jobs so far. The bottoms went together easily but the seat backs were a battle. After trying a variety of materials with which to stuff the seat backs, I went to an upholstery supply who sold me a very thick bat of dense cotton batting, just like the stuff that was originally used. It worked quite well. The trick is to put in about twice as much as you think you need and pull like hell to fit the seat cover over it. To avoid wrinkles, the batting should be laid down in complete slabs that match the shape and size of the space being filled. In spite of hours of work, fitting and refitting, I ended up with a little wrinkle in one of the seat backs, but this came out nicely with the judicious use of a heat gun to shrink the leather (as recommended by the trimmer at G.W.Bartlett). Nick Saltarelli 1954 XK120SE OTS 1968 E-type OTS
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Improve your Jag-lovers experience with the Mozilla FireFox Browser!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ©Jag-loversTM Ltd / JagWEBTM 1993 - 2023 All rights reserved. Jag-lovers is supported by JagWEBTM For Terms of Use and General Rules see our Disclaimer Use of the Jag-lovers logo or trademark name on sites other than Jag-lovers itself in a manner implying endorsement of commercial activities whatsoever is prohibited. Sections of this Web Site may publish members and visitors comments, opinion and photographs/images - Jag-lovers Ltd does not assume or have any responsibility or any liability for members comments or opinions, nor does it claim ownership or copyright of any material that belongs to the original poster including images. The word 'Jaguar' and the leaping cat device, whether used separately or in combination, are registered trademarks and are the property of Jaguar Cars, England. Some images may also be © Jaguar Cars. Mirroring or downloading of this site or the publication of material or any extracts therefrom in original or altered form from these pages onto other sites (including reproduction by any other Jaguar enthusiast sites) without express permission violates Jag-lovers Ltd copyright and is prohibited |
![]() |