|
Body ShimsBack from two weeks vacation and just catching the tail end of this thread. The parts catalogue shows four different part numbers for the XK120 chassis frame: C3387 for all alloy; C3387/1 for early steel OTS and early FHC; C6692 for late OTS; C6762 for late FHC and all DHC. The changes in the chassis from early to late OTS and from early to late FHC correspond to changes in the front engine mounts and gearbox tailcase mount from rectangular to round. I suspect there may also have been changes to the outriggers, but I don't have enough info to confirm this. If your chassis is from a late FHC, I believe this DHC body should be a straightforward installation (at least as straightforward as these XK's ever are, ha,ha), but be forewarned that the shimming will be a trial and error procedure. If it is from an early FHC you may find other dissimilarities. Early FHC's like mine and Carl's have thick rubber shims on the outriggers rather than the aluminum blocks found on later FHC's and probably all DHC's as mentioned by others. Also the brake master cylinder mounting bracket was changed when they went to the tandem system (different bolt spacing). Rob Reilly - XK120 FHC 679187 Rob, Were it that I was far along enough to face the "shimming and spacing' tasks. But it will come and to that end, might you or anyone else have described the procedure and pitfalls sometime in the past. Could one assume that the stiffer body of an FHC will make the job less onerous or conversely, might said stiffnes mask problems for later "discovery". Just musing in anticipation - Klaus Nielsen Rob, Sorry, I forgot to ask another question. I received my spacer/shim collection comprising various thicknesses of aluminium and dark fiber discs, all in a gallon can. They cannot be divided into four like sets, so I assume they must go in "as needed" to fill the local void. Are there any recommendations or convention wrt. fiber up, down, in between or what... Thanks - Klaus Nielsen Klaus, my limited experience shows that the aluminum/alloy spacers are standard and fit between sheet metal support components and that the slack is taken up by the fiber(fibre) spacers. But I could be all wet (sorry, been watching '40s movies) Jim Warren, '140 dhc Klaus: The combination of aluminum and steel results in galvanic action. I believe the aluminum becomes sacrificial in the process, but the steel also shows an increasing tendency to corrode. The fiber washer provides insulation. If you need two of the washers, put one on each side of the aluminum shim. It is interesting that my early FHC with rubber shims showed no corrosion on the body or the chassis at the shim points! I chalk that up to the fact there was no aluminum. - Carl Hanson, 1951 XK120 FHC Klaus, I thought fibre washers between steel and aluminium were about stopping electrolytic action. (A lesson Aston took a long while to learn). But as always, I'm probably wrong. - Roger Learmonth Jim, Thanks for the comments...both of them. - Klaus Nielsen Carl Thanks...and of course. I feel rather stupid, having had numerous steel ejector pins freeze hard in wax injection mold dies made from 6061 and other alu' stock. As my shims have all beeen "sacrificed", might it be worth passivating the new parts before installing them? Regards - Klaus Nielsen Roger, I am sure you are right, I was just denser than dense. - Thanks, Klaus Nielsen updatated 9/2/98... Dear friends, since some of you (I am speaking of Dick Cavicke here) were so kind to provide measurements of their cars in response to an inquiry from Roger Learmouth, I am hoping for the same response to the following question. What is the gap between body and chassis at each of your shim locations on the XK120 FHC? OK, if you don't want to dirty your clothes and get under the firewall it's all right, because I am mainly interested in the dimension at the rear shims. I am in the process of shimming the body and have no clear idea what the acceptable range is. Porter's book says the coupe body was raised 1 1/2 inches compared to the OTS using aluminum blocks on the outriggers, but is that a uniform lift both front and back? My firewall appears to be lifted 1" off the frame, the sides 1 1/2" and the rear about 1". Does this agree with anyone else out there? I will thank you for any data you can provide. Suggestion: Our library should have a database of measurements for the various XK's. - Carl Hanson, 1951 XK120 FHC #679102 Bedford, MA, USA I would like to second the idea that our library should have a database of measurements for the various XK's. - Skip Smith Carl: I visited friends at Classic European Restorations in Oceanside, CA today to view and ask questions about a 120 FHC they are finishing for a local club member. Here's their explanation of the FHC body shims. Basically they agree with the dimensions you have mentioned. The firewall shims are only about 1", the sides 1 1/2"; however, the rear shims are "as required". They said that after installing the front and side shims, the rear is allowed to assume its own level and shims are fitted to hold it there. The FHC they were working on had a 3/4" shims at the rear. I asked if they would consider increasing the size of the rear shims if it had been necessary to get more drip rail clearance above the door frame? They said "yes". Incidentally, this car already had a generous 1/4" clearance between the top of the door frames and the drip rail. They added that they have several thicknesses of shims they use at the rear and always try to avoid forcing that part of the body into a new position. - Good luck, Dick Cavicke Thank you, Dick, for your response. As I align the body, I am temporarily using wood blocks for shims to hold a shape that I can weld. I began to get worried when I realized that my original shims were rubber and could have squashed out to any dimension. The rear fender (wing) stays provide a limit to how far the rear can be raised, I discovered. As the body lifts, the stays start pushing out the rear fender. There is some take up available, but not too much. I hold a straight edge along the front fender and door line to keep the rear fender in alignment. Thanks again. - Carl Hanson, 1951 XK120 FHC Bedford, MA
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Improve your Jag-lovers experience with the Mozilla FireFox Browser!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ©Jag-loversTM Ltd / JagWEBTM 1993 - 2023 All rights reserved. Jag-lovers is supported by JagWEBTM For Terms of Use and General Rules see our Disclaimer Use of the Jag-lovers logo or trademark name on sites other than Jag-lovers itself in a manner implying endorsement of commercial activities whatsoever is prohibited. Sections of this Web Site may publish members and visitors comments, opinion and photographs/images - Jag-lovers Ltd does not assume or have any responsibility or any liability for members comments or opinions, nor does it claim ownership or copyright of any material that belongs to the original poster including images. The word 'Jaguar' and the leaping cat device, whether used separately or in combination, are registered trademarks and are the property of Jaguar Cars, England. Some images may also be © Jaguar Cars. Mirroring or downloading of this site or the publication of material or any extracts therefrom in original or altered form from these pages onto other sites (including reproduction by any other Jaguar enthusiast sites) without express permission violates Jag-lovers Ltd copyright and is prohibited |
![]() |